Hey.
It seems that the mirrors do not have the repomd.xml.asc file.
Does the main repo provide it?
-- Thanks Leon
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 12:10, Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel centos-devel@centos.org wrote:
Hey.
It seems that the mirrors do not have the repomd.xml.asc file.
Does the main repo provide it?
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
2021/10/29 01:09:24 [2715496] *deleting AppStream/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:11:04 [2715496] *deleting AppStream/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:13:09 [2715496] *deleting BaseOS/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:14:46 [2715496] *deleting BaseOS/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:14:46 [2715496] *deleting HighAvailability/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:14:47 [2715496] *deleting HighAvailability/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:16:49 [2715496] *deleting PowerTools/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:17:46 [2715496] *deleting PowerTools/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:17:53 [2715496] *deleting RT/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:17:53 [2715496] *deleting ResilientStorage/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:20:26 [2715496] *deleting extras/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc 2021/10/29 01:20:26 [2715496] *deleting extras/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc
Not sure why.
-- Thanks Leon _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
~pete
On 11/2/21 14:14, Peter Meier wrote:
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
Thank you very much!
~pete
Am 02.11.21 um 21:54 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 11/2/21 14:14, Peter Meier wrote:
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
JFI: repomd.xml.asc is missed again ...
-- Leon
On 2/28/22 04:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel wrote:
Am 02.11.21 um 21:54 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 11/2/21 14:14, Peter Meier wrote:
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
JFI: repomd.xml.asc is missed again ...
And it is again fixed.
We are working on moving the c8s process over to gitlab.com to mirror the c9s process where all this will be automated and that should prevent this from happening once everything is moved.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 11:06 AM Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 2/28/22 04:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel wrote:
Am 02.11.21 um 21:54 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 11/2/21 14:14, Peter Meier wrote:
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
JFI: repomd.xml.asc is missed again ...
And it is again fixed.
We are working on moving the c8s process over to gitlab.com to mirror the c9s process where all this will be automated and that should prevent this from happening once everything is moved.
My understanding is that signed repos are manual on c9s as well, unless something changed recently?
On 3/2/22 10:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 11:06 AM Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 2/28/22 04:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel wrote:
Am 02.11.21 um 21:54 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 11/2/21 14:14, Peter Meier wrote:
It does not seem to be there. It looks like they were there 2021-10-28 but my logs say
There is also https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/510
Fixing it now guys.
JFI: repomd.xml.asc is missed again ...
And it is again fixed.
We are working on moving the c8s process over to gitlab.com to mirror the c9s process where all this will be automated and that should prevent this from happening once everything is moved.
My understanding is that signed repos are manual on c9s as well, unless something changed recently?
Everything, including secureboot signing, is being automated for both c9s and c8s .. they are in varying stages of planning / implementation (secureboot signing, repodata signing, rpm signing, etc).
-
Johnny Hughes -
Leon Fauster -
Neal Gompa -
Peter Meier -
Stephen John Smoogen