Discuss April 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

181 participants
171 discussions

imagemagick convert/display eps file no decode delegate
by Tony Schreiner 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

I am finding on all my CentOS 5.8 systems (all fully updated but a variety of package mixes) that the display or convert commands from ImageMagick are unable to handle eps files. I get error output as follows, curious if anyone else sees this $ convert rna.eps rna.epi convert rna.eps rna.epi Error: /undefinedfilename in (72x72) Operand stack: Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push Dictionary stack: --dict:1154/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:70/200(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: 2 GPL Ghostscript 8.70: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 Error: /undefinedfilename in (72x72) Operand stack: Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push Dictionary stack: --dict:1154/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:70/200(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: 2 GPL Ghostscript 8.70: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 convert: no decode delegate for this image format `rna.eps'. convert: Postscript delegate failed `rna.eps'. convert: missing an image filename `rna.epi'. ImageMagick 5.2.8.0-12.el5 ghostcript-8.0-14.el5 the equivalent GraphicsMagick command gm convert does work This is a recent development, but I can't say how recent Tony Schreiner

1 0

Virt-manager requires stdin to run?
by Jason Pyeron 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Anyone have any ideas on this? $ ssh root(a)x.y.z.a virt-manager & $ Warning: untrusted X11 forwarding setup failed: xauth key data not generated Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. [2]+ Stopped ssh root(a)x.y.z.a virt-manager $ bg [2]+ ssh root(a)x.y.z.a virt-manager & $ [2]+ Stopped ssh root(a)x.y.z.a virt-manager -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

1 0

Help with software raid + LVM on Centos 6
by aurfalien 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi all, Please excuse the many posts. Wondering if any one can help me with the the setup. I have 2x2TBdisks. I would like to mirror them. I would like to create two LVMs so that I can snap shot from one to the other. During Centos 6 install, how would I go about this as its confusing? So far I am here; 1) Created the following raid devices; md0 500MB (use it for /boot) md1 4000MB (use it for swap) md2 All remaining space (use it for /) 2) Created two physical LVMs, one on md0, the other on md1. 3) ? This is were I am confused, do I create two LVM volume groups? I was thinking that my primary LVM can be ~1TB and that my other LVM which I snapshot to can also be ~1TB. Anyways, I am very green on this topic as I usually do hardware raids but I don't have that option. Thanks in advance, - aurf

2 2

Re: [CentOS] yum yum or not?
by James B. Byrne 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

On Fri, April 27, 2012 04:15, Shaun wrote: > Well this is it. I've used both 'remove' and 'history undo' and had > better success (system not having something important removed) with > the latter. I have only this suspicion. It may be that yum history undo only rolls back the changes actually made by the previous yum update/install since it 'knows' that the system environment has not changed in the interim. Whereas yum history remove, since it has to cherry-pick packages from a possibly changed environment, instead removes rpm dependencies based on the package specs of the items directly added by the original yum command, whether these were installed in that transaction or not. But, this is only a guess. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Centos 6 - Create raid 1 + LVM during gui install
by aurfalien 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi all, Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for Centos 6? Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or vise versa? Its seems diff then doing it for Centos 5. - aurf

2 2

More on the ATA sense error
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

AFAIK, no one's responded to me about whether I should just turn off smartd. At any rate, here's more info: this server only started spitting Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: sda: Current [descriptor]: sense key: Recovered Err ror Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: Add. Sense: ATA pass through information availl able Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hh ex): Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: 72 01 00 1d 00 00 00 0e 09 0c 00 00 00 00 00 00 Apr 25 07:47:50 <server> kernel: 00 4f 00 c2 40 50 for every drive - and it has four - right after updated to the most current kernel 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 #1 SMP and rebooted. So one question becomes three: a) should I turn off smartd? b) should I reboot to the previous kernel, and see if it keeps up? c) is this a known bug? mark

1 0

fail2ban logrotate failure
by Bob Hoffman 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

I got the fail2ban from epel. There were a number of issues relating to using a log file... logwatch was looking for both fail2ban and fail2ban.log logrotate file fail2ban added looked for fail2ban.log and then reset itself to syslog fail2ban itself went to syslog, over riding its fail2ban.log. took a while, but I use /var/log/fail2ban now, that finally worked through logrotates and logwatch. Problem with centos variant of fail2ban: logrotate causes all 'ban' actions to stop happening. I am pretty sure it stops reading the logs but still functions. Unban actions still keep showing up in the log, but the 'ban' actions just stop. Program is running, but no longer working. Long searches online show a million others with the same issue. Only way to prevent it seems to be to add a reload or restart in the syslog file. This is undesired due to losing all banned ips listed. It happens as part of the logrotate. The logrotate file I have changed a few times and recently tried this postrotate /usr/bin/fail2ban-client set logtarget /var/log/fail2ban 1>/dev/null || true endscript setting the logtarget, which the original called for changing it to syslog and 2>dev/null || true so what would you do? I imagine when logrotate happens and syslog restarts something is causing fail2ban to stop working properly, but still timing 'unbans'. This is apparently a bug/problem for almost everyone of all distros. Other than just uninstalling, the only way to make it work would be a restart around 4 every morning, making any long term bans useless. My last thought is to just throw the /var/log/fail2ban to be rotated by syslog like maillog and the others..and not doing anything special. Maybe it would just work. I write here because I know there are hundreds of you and someone must have figured out how to make fail2ban work for more than 24 hours without a restart....

2 2

High load
by Kaushal Shriyan 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi Is there a way to nail down the issue of high load on a server basically trying to understand the reason behind high load at a specific time period. I use top command but it does not have history. Nagios reports saying "*[04-25-2012 10:11:00] SERVICE ALERT: dev;LOAD;WARNING;HARD;3;WARNING - load average: 6.88, 6.36, 5.71"* * * Please help me understand. Regards Kaushal

4 3

High load averages copying USB
by Lists 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Problem as follows: 1) Plug in an external USB drive. 2) Mount it anywhere. Doesn't matter how. 3) Copy a few GB of data to the drive from a non-USB disk. 4) Watch the load average "climb" to 5.x, sometimes 10.x or more. Why? This on an otherwise unloaded system. Doesn't matter how many cores, how much RAM, 32/64 bit, etc. Why should copying some files to a USB drive cause load averages to climb so high? (and network monitors to freak out?)

5 7

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
by Johan Vermeulen 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing? Greetings, j. verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid. Nux! <nux(a)li.nux.ro>schreef: >On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +0000 >> nux(a)li.nux.ro wrote: >> >>> Jake, >>> >>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. >>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least >>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger >>> scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any >>> "meta" packages? >> Hi, >> >> The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a >> LAN >> and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating >> delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them. >> >> The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These >> would >> usually be tagged with a ".hr" tag (ie, >> <packagename>-<version>.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal. >> >> But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would >> require a rebuild. >> >> So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice >> mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them >> to >> "/var/www/html/repository/<arch>" (Which is actually just a link >> to /home/<username>/rpmbuild/RPMS) >> >> Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other >> packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run: >> >> createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/<arch> >> createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS >> >> A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now >> from local machines on the LAN I would just use "yum install >> libobasis* >> libreoffice*" etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra >> packages. >> and "yum update" takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the >> above..) >> >> This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could >> also be done publicly, however it is still a "messy" method even if >> somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo). >> >> I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for >> EL6. >> >> I guess that raises the question of "You have the repo, rpmbuild >> etc setup, why don't you build them your self?", and to answer it: >> >> Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core >> here....) >> >> But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-). > >And that's what I did as well. Check this out: >http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_fo… >I'll spam this in a separate message on the usual places. > >Also, more good news comes from Redhat as RHEL 6.3 will contains >Libreoffice 3.4.5! > >-- >Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >Nux! >www.nux.ro >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss April 2012