Discuss April 2014

discuss@lists.centos.org

172 participants
139 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Getting yum to install to python 2.7 dir
by James B. Byrne 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

On Sun, April 27, 2014 23:33, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > This is a bad hack. Undo the damage. Then install the official CentOS > Software Collections repo. > > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/ > > It has Python27. > I followed the instruction on that link and discovered that one basically needs to be a RedHat subscriber to get any use out of it. At least insofar as httpd-2.4 is concerned. I cannot speak what restrictions, if any, are placed on the Python-2.7 package. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Re: [CentOS] SELInux and POSTFIX
by James B. Byrne 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

On Wed, April 23, 2014 16:44, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Looks like this is allowed in rhel6.5 policy. You could try > > selinux-policy-3.7.19-235.el6 > on people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6 > yum --enablerepo=localfile update selinux\* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * Webmin: download.webmin.com * base: centos.mirror.rafal.ca * epel: fedora.mirror.nexicom.net * extras: mirror.netflash.net * updates: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: selinux-policy = 3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 for package: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch --> Processing Dependency: selinux-policy = 3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 for package: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-235.el6 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch (@updates) Requires: selinux-policy = 3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 Removing: selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch (@updates) selinux-policy = 3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 Updated By: selinux-policy-3.7.19-235.el6.noarch (localfile) selinux-policy = 3.7.19-235.el6 Available: selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6.noarch (base) selinux-policy = 3.7.19-231.el6 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I have these packages in /root/RPMS/repo/Packages: total 3776 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 69264 Apr 24 20:52 opendmarc-1.1.3-3.1.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 845052 Apr 23 16:41 selinux-policy-3.7.19-235.el6.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2946848 Apr 23 16:41 selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-235.el6.noarch.rpm I have run 'createrepo --database --update /root/RPMS/repo' What do I not understand respecting performing this update? I only noted this issue following implementation of an spf policy daemon with Postfix. However, that change was the reason I was looking at the log files to begin with so the situation may have been present for a very long time before that. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6
by ngeorgop 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

New version of chromium (34.0.1847.132) chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.i686.rpm <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSR0pRLXU1Q1JQTmc/edit?usp=shari…> Source: chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.src.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSd1NWWDM2bHRpU1k/edit> I was *OBLIGED* to patch gtk2-2.20.1 in order to build it: gtk2-2.20.1-5.el6.i686.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSVnAzVlhuakUwUkU/edit> gtk2-devel-2.20.1-5.el6.i686.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSYjJSLXVTT0FucnM/edit> Source: gtk2-2.20.1-5.el6.src.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSdVQ0SG9hY1pmOHM/edit> Waiting for comments -- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-34-0-1847-132-1-el6-tp5… Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

5 9

Ext4 mess .... and EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_mb_generate_buddy
by Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hi, I'm faced with a very strange behaviour: Centos 6.5 server, Hardware ISCSI HBA from Emulex OneConnect, most recent drivers and firmware from emulex installed. Directly attached a 10G ISCSI Storage from QSan. Two Raid volumes, Raid 5, 8 Disks each at 2 TB so 14 TB each logic raid volume. Both volumes are logged in and usable as sdb and sdc to the server. Formatted with ext4 -m 0 -v /dev/sd... Now I copied about 600 GB from an old server to one of the new volumes. No problems at all. But moving other data from the old server to the second volume shows the error in the logs: EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group 2592: 0 blocks in bitmap, 24544 in gd group grows by 16. But the more strange thing I realised today is, that all the data on the first volume (on sdb) shows up on sdc as well + the new data too. Now I'm totally confused and currently there are no more messages in the system log. The files on sdc don't show up on sdb! If I do e.g. a md5sum on the files on both volumes they are the same as is the contents of e.g. some textfiles I checked. May be someone has an idea what might cause a) the error and b) why dose the data from sdb also shows up on sdc? b) also occurred also with the original redhat/centos driver for the ISCSI HBA. May be I have to use partitions and not the whole device or LVM, ... xfs? Other storages from Qsan dont show that problem and other storages with bigger filesystems or e.g. xfs are o.k. too. confused regards . Götz

1 1

Mailman 2.1.16 or later for CentOS 5
by Robert Heller 27 Apr '14

27 Apr '14

Is there a repository with a newer version of mailman for CentOS 5? CentOS 5 ships with mailman 2.1.9 and it looks like I need some of the features of newer version of mailman to cope with DMARC issues relating to aol, yahoo, and hotmail with at least one of my mailman lists. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller(a)deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 26 Apr '14

26 Apr '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2014:0433 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:56:20 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0433 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140425105620.GA6338(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0433 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 57e573cb29b42ae5e997c57fcd6158037ff8ff855892fc49f3ca52285ce7432c kernel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 6d981d062248ae25b2fc83606ba4fd3b63b8726fc696690f174cab3895caf282 kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 1343b4079365c2242181b59eee452632f42536c30b53d8e1f88647b73b9a49cf kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 865b929f3d200783d9403f65cad58fcd2fe4ec233ba117051d0f01fe39ba4231 kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 3f7b9f68ce176a378c27f26fd9a6072df91df5045d056158e4d31beecae6ec2a kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.noarch.rpm 02ea69c5dc980a534fc79ebb03d0457abb1effbd6adca59a1cbd0e52ad577c16 kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i386.rpm df0073e7fbbb21a8de4538dba7c8e67e8341e970fda2ea4205f756c4853caed7 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 7ce38822e054bd13ccaf675b5b455f37ebefe078ede2f706e6e117f9456fb1b8 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 02f8852f47f86ed6ef2d3dd8be8e8c308f2a87d4f0721947e06247bbe4824910 kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 5d610e6eea3d85f2579dd059f7b8aeb6e0c4468fa629d3db4d95284edf5ee8dc kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm x86_64: 5c0197bf994bfa5e2b8f7a02853d37fc6c77b968d4bc907d843f4cb550f5301d kernel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 3e6e85d62af1a10a548ce6acc3c171b4561a4b23eafa9f292f18a4d2002d4bc4 kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 85e3ccfd137dbb22a1a5ae8a7a8e0e8e438ef97e429cde1596133443ac5a5305 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 4ea255a8f62ac66c0c75bc66ad71c1013ad90987f0f1e508ced6932680ccba20 kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 3f7b9f68ce176a378c27f26fd9a6072df91df5045d056158e4d31beecae6ec2a kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.noarch.rpm 44990037f790aab6dffb438edea8d350d46c8d1bd3745c9bd2fa4339c02e2b12 kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm c034a3aec970668f05c577d6edb6390b8a954b76776790b070d3d0008acb78b3 kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm e36beba7617c7d4268fd4d8222d32ec855f8097c3d007d5e4b406f79ce62a349 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: d92512bcf7dff2a7f135bf5315b9f434fff12b3dc5dc2ce05eb28a3f03866ebc kernel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 13 ************************************************

1 0

[OT] how do I remove a battery
by Michael Hennebry 26 Apr '14

26 Apr '14

I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1 motherboard with a dead battery. The battery mounts vertically: http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving. It does not want to move. I am reluctant to apply any more force than I already have without knowing how to apply it. How do I remove the battery? -- Michael hennebry(a)web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu "SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then." -- John Woods

11 18

Some basic SELinux questions
by Stephen Harris 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

At my place we don't use SELinux because we have a gazillion tonnes of legacy software that just are not compatible with the default policies. No one wants to go to the effort of working out everything that needs changing. We also use cfengine for central management. Which somestimes causes a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified on my machine. So I want to be able to track when specific files were changed. My obvious thought was "create an SELinux audit policy that can track file changes, raise a log message", and we can monitor the logs. At this point I'm at a loss. Let's say I want to know when /local/app/my_app/etc/myfile.conf has been modified; how would I do this? Any ideas? Failing that I guess I could use inotify, but I don't know how well this would scale to 100s of files. Thanks! -- rgds Stephen

4 6

Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?
by Robert Moskowitz 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the OpenSSL list) The reason I suspect a problem is that HIPL for Centos (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/) is not creating the ECDSA Host Identity, whereas my Fedora installation IS creating the ECDSA HI.

3 3

Re: [CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?
by Robert Moskowitz 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

On 04/25/2014 08:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 25.04.2014 13:57, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? >> >> How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the >> OpenSSL list) >> >> The reason I suspect a problem is that HIPL for Centos >> (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/) is not creating the ECDSA Host Identity, >> whereas my Fedora installation IS creating the ECDSA HI > the OpenSSL version does (one of the news in 6.5) > but sadly OpenSSH was not rebuilt against the new OpenSSL > so no, currently no ECDSA before RHEL7-Beta1 Harald, I thank you for this insight. It seems when I hit a truly knotty issue you come through with the pointers to get me going in the right direction. This is not OpenSSH, but HIP for Linux. The HIPL binaries for Centos were compiled on a 6.5 system with all current updates. Or so the developer told me :) Is there some switch that is needed? > here you go for the history > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901#c108 Interesting and so sad. I did a lot of review of drafts for rfc6090 with Dr. McGrew; more on style than math ("David, I don't understand what you are trying to say here." ;) ). Plus look at the errata pages; cfrg is talking about issuing a new rfc to include all the errata. The supposed inside story is that NSA got really upset that their licensing of the patents was not getting them COTS products, as sales to DoD is a small portion for these vendors. So Kevin joined David as co-author. This is mission critical. We can live with RSA for the pilot, but MUST be on ECDSA for launch. Since my day job is a major RedHat customer, I can have someone from that side of the company do a bug submission against RH6 to get this addressed.

1 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss April 2014