Maybe this came out wrong. What I meant is: I was told RHEL doesn't do major application upgrades in one version, so we would end op with Firefox 3.6.x in CentOs 6.x in a few years from now. Apparently this is not true. So now I,m wondering if a move to LO within CentOs 6 is imaginable.
Grt. J. verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid.
Johan Vermeulen jvermeulen@cawdekempen.beschreef:
If Rhel/CentOs goes from Firefox3.6 to Firefox 10, could they go from OpenOffice to LibreOffice as wel?
Greetings, James
verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid.
centos-announce-request@centos.orgschreef:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
- CEEA-2012:0327 CentOS 6 firefox Update (Johnny Hughes)
- CEBA-2012:0337 CentOS 6 nss Update (Johnny Hughes)
- CEEA-2012:0329 CentOS 6 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes)
- CEBA-2012:0339 CentOS 6 openswan Update (Johnny Hughes)
- CEBA-2012:0338 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update (Johnny Hughes)
- CEBA-2012:0335 CentOS 6 iptables Update (Johnny Hughes)
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:17:37 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0327 CentOS 6 firefox Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225051737.GA11681@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0327
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0327.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: d2599a661b132aa2ddd7392eae5685646cf3c635d0ef0267599b8740f09c12e2 firefox-10.0.1-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 77de9c554ac1f16ba2520f07cee4c15d4e1e2979cf740c7c002fea07c34faf96 xulrunner-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm fcd332a2aeb56279601acf6494a33a2983344f5b9982f37c6800cb9e3aa4f663 xulrunner-devel-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm 6461e5d96c34674c8d429155b071ef03f770951c296667b9fe481b4bbafa78b5 yelp-2.28.1-13.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64: d2599a661b132aa2ddd7392eae5685646cf3c635d0ef0267599b8740f09c12e2 firefox-10.0.1-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 22976c0f8338775d7407b9239c3f9f32ec7ca88faa10c94f437772ae9b380137 firefox-10.0.1-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 77de9c554ac1f16ba2520f07cee4c15d4e1e2979cf740c7c002fea07c34faf96 xulrunner-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm b3441c386c20957faa6130d8bed19875ac5d1494f3a385ed12249191792e1fa2 xulrunner-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm fcd332a2aeb56279601acf6494a33a2983344f5b9982f37c6800cb9e3aa4f663 xulrunner-devel-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm 8d92e10fba11d7b9300d13244f49e6fb1ce97bdde46ee197447af2dcbf4d9699 xulrunner-devel-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm a839b1a862c44fa07ce558f0f4a81a254abda5ad7cacef7f41fa6c6c591fe04f yelp-2.28.1-13.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source: 1a53d0a7664910c65c00711815fcfd8a87f965b5529d6135099d989454251231 firefox-10.0.1-1.el6.centos.src.rpm 385d3e038296c9ca12d13bc5c3396049d70f4f8a879fc2468b6ce9c3a93ec96b xulrunner-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.src.rpm dc668b084f356b2049f8e724476ff665876bea6b8abbe533aa5555d7cea42c07 yelp-2.28.1-13.el6_2.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:20:36 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0337 CentOS 6 nss Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225052036.GA11839@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0337
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0337.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: 96a9433b9cfb6009dcc4e4b61168752313ab925cc72d9cf2bd104136bd1770f5 nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.i686.rpm e1e90d9135b4087a9f97ea2ba0b6025e8d6a812e98a1743fe897474d8ec719e5 nspr-devel-4.8.9-3.el6_2.i686.rpm cbefa7c87e5dc51dab0a433f47c0cd4f6b06ca0c9c3f2579f32141d9b3d30998 nss-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm a495226e3abee7423caa069e2b8a1749ee63543800b37b5e3cbd7afcf05d65e1 nss-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm 54c94e1640a123d70b4ae4446f750432c47ba0e786237791695ce47289312020 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm 440a26179856dc203924ae31147056bfda9a11e35826c23cacb06dbe5a520a95 nss-sysinit-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm ff4640259883bd7d9d9fb33d3a295328023c06d5b3865dce69839657d0202761 nss-tools-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm 1b1f933409d29705c281e800769c5610811a65d6568674ddda7dace5e9db76f9 nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.i686.rpm 89039a389f73a99561ba3629dfb0eac27f031e59c209ea4eaee9fcea5141a632 nss-util-devel-3.13.1-3.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64: 96a9433b9cfb6009dcc4e4b61168752313ab925cc72d9cf2bd104136bd1770f5 nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.i686.rpm 0555f49bb513bb0e7188f5a894898e3650c8d8472b990f283749254e59ce8d16 nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.x86_64.rpm e1e90d9135b4087a9f97ea2ba0b6025e8d6a812e98a1743fe897474d8ec719e5 nspr-devel-4.8.9-3.el6_2.i686.rpm 9ce858d877be449049d136db3167fe7775151861886ac9a728a94411613c3d35 nspr-devel-4.8.9-3.el6_2.x86_64.rpm cbefa7c87e5dc51dab0a433f47c0cd4f6b06ca0c9c3f2579f32141d9b3d30998 nss-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm e0b350fc3c83e8fa088a64e97e308c0ac254c07836b5d2c1b1abf651550ac433 nss-3.13.1-6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm a495226e3abee7423caa069e2b8a1749ee63543800b37b5e3cbd7afcf05d65e1 nss-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm d5b1fb57fe5c17ba10057de8ffa632f963b813e5de576d152c18b2708f627c6d nss-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm 54c94e1640a123d70b4ae4446f750432c47ba0e786237791695ce47289312020 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.i686.rpm 1266afcedd753ef7b93d722782367fd5f12962dfcf6bee8093861b9587f243c4 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.13.1-6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm a2d7acdca92b38c0daab5713413cb97ccadf28e186494c87fff905120d8921bf nss-sysinit-3.13.1-6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm e82cd7c4c577721da6698a3b20cb90203ee5a6240181eb4ebf877ed8e86c173b nss-tools-3.13.1-6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm 1b1f933409d29705c281e800769c5610811a65d6568674ddda7dace5e9db76f9 nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.i686.rpm b90b050163b1605b8d7bd002955899fe4dd43f865462edfb5470de461906fbb7 nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.x86_64.rpm 89039a389f73a99561ba3629dfb0eac27f031e59c209ea4eaee9fcea5141a632 nss-util-devel-3.13.1-3.el6_2.i686.rpm 41e31d4aad5ad08ada416aa0d5c8ea4121ab3171ba211f45f06f5b6fbb213793 nss-util-devel-3.13.1-3.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source: e528dee7d721d3a621e883a2ea7df3befc8f3a4cc19fa37c3f97f773bccab2ae nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.src.rpm 05b8b089f4dd7cca6c022e900a52ca1d2e036d716847c4cc4d8fa2eb89b3a049 nss-3.13.1-6.el6_2.src.rpm f0273a41ba5b4459ad0247611cfa473345886f21bab6dcb096e84d82f588a464 nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
Message: 3 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:22:40 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0329 CentOS 6 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225052240.GA11930@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0329
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0329.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: 0deb275c3241a3943572cab3b6c01515525ad42a679df5dabe66206a4f5f4441 thunderbird-10.0.1-3.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64: 3b1a148fddacd067db594fde1b86bf3448d6cf1079b38438d7432a4764e1db29 thunderbird-10.0.1-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source: fba41db75d164461c9603a4735a0f670dcf29d9daf6520611c0806e4ca7965a9 thunderbird-10.0.1-3.el6.centos.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
Message: 4 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:23:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0339 CentOS 6 openswan Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225052310.GA12010@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0339
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0339.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: 2ad5574961178d92774023258d278131c83acfa0bfa1d2584d06fd9e64d16d78 openswan-2.6.32-10.el6_2.i686.rpm ba280a99b04ca752185ff05289ba1f7e429a26186baf68eaf579cbcdea93e5d1 openswan-doc-2.6.32-10.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64: dec60d50e94a8e644d1f92e44ec8ee8770e5ab69073f39e914c8efbd47ac0fb6 openswan-2.6.32-10.el6_2.x86_64.rpm fd82468d39d724dbe68cb8a63f72217a6c3aaefbd368739c8b9fa7c30ba66d2e openswan-doc-2.6.32-10.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source: 901e69b53004c2c736e4d863c4583563f83ed8f9c6ae6a9bf185eb3797100272 openswan-2.6.32-10.el6_2.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
Message: 5 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:23:47 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0338 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225052347.GA12114@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0338
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0338.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: a6af66e794daab711544237711fc60a877d6a766117abe9be5404262f6688446 selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm c7d4083b26698968559660235c43bb10a97751ebfff7dc3b64abc9462db76c39 selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm 9863d5eb132e9d24874f17018afec339347c59ac29dd76440944b433554994d7 selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm 26968984b4a1a1eb3910193f7bcfea6d70d615c7be5cc53523c2b9d96f44a575 selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm fc4da222ceb175ab2f72862084a68f5e818e452457666b7e85f37795f8f8f010 selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm
x86_64: 71d4b96c4ac6ea7f5e9327da9e54be5d9d88774cae563c793a5063dbe94d51c9 selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm f75088e18583cf323f24696131ac3567ac9aa992b04c1cb2761938cff4cab69c selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm 9d89b2389cca275c4f1e23ad55ae6d0b24802ec7545957f4c2bc46a9954deff4 selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm 6ff9803ed6ec2393aa3a65b161ec76ed1162922754c804370229ae701976f8a5 selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm c4edce76d8f801df40d83ed88e28690d7719614920b6b68bc81b196324953aad selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.noarch.rpm
Source: ddbb5765611d2fa274c41cc42b0731f3ce56eb5cba1bd5bc5fd23beff49a44c7 selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.9.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
Message: 6 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:41:06 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0335 CentOS 6 iptables Update To: centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 20120225104106.GA27872@chakra.karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0335
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0335.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386: 6a7d7caa6fbee984d04f36138cad2c8c423348d96f7d631f26ef465b102bcb54 iptables-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.i686.rpm 78c572e6d1922558eae95995ea36858d43a33d9c956dd67fc62f393d7f0a26c3 iptables-devel-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.i686.rpm 91627a7f937e8e5c7a4904ba4b30c20cccfc707e43e86eef59d19acf2d68e4e8 iptables-ipv6-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64: 6a7d7caa6fbee984d04f36138cad2c8c423348d96f7d631f26ef465b102bcb54 iptables-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.i686.rpm 31caf99ebbbc8db11957b1b910bbac0367828338fe07982f7c31c744416415bc iptables-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.x86_64.rpm 78c572e6d1922558eae95995ea36858d43a33d9c956dd67fc62f393d7f0a26c3 iptables-devel-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.i686.rpm 9da9193de62224271ec2340d171c3282b3d226185f8f34dfb4410d22ff45be47 iptables-devel-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.x86_64.rpm 36511e71182583c5775d442f02f5aaab115252c3eaf343890d151440b06ceb02 iptables-ipv6-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source: 0e7eb17349dd0543c4e817c8f5025d9f2ddeffc70a6f165528ebb3a4a3b86aaf iptables-1.4.7-5.1.el6_2.src.rpm
-- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos@irc.freenode.net
CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 14
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/25/2012 02:52 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Maybe this came out wrong. What I meant is: I was told RHEL doesn't do major application upgrades in one version, so we would end op with Firefox 3.6.x in CentOs 6.x in a few years from now. Apparently this is not true. So now I,m wondering if a move to LO within CentOs 6 is imaginable.
CentOS releases what Red Hat releases as sources.
Red Hat released an update from Firefox 3.6 to Firefox 10 ... and CentOS built and released the same update.
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Grt. J. verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid.
Johan Vermeulen jvermeulen@cawdekempen.beschreef:
If Rhel/CentOs goes from Firefox3.6 to Firefox 10, could they go from OpenOffice to LibreOffice as wel?
Greetings, James
verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid.
centos-announce-request@centos.orgschreef:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 20:54 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
The best way to install LibreOffice on CentOS: http://pastebin.com/ZrsmjF9m
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:06:41 -0800 Anthony Lee Vanover II wrote:
The best way to install LibreOffice on CentOS: http://pastebin.com/ZrsmjF9m
You forgot the helppack.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic office@plnet.rs wrote:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguin vnpenguin@vnoss.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic office@plnet.rs wrote:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.
Regards,
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be: * I then have a Selinux module * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
greetings, J.
On 27-02-12 09:00, wwp wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguinvnpenguin@vnoss.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoffice@plnet.rs wrote:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.
Regards,
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Johan,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen jvermeulen@cawdekempen.be wrote:
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
- I then have a Selinux module
- Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often, and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.
Regards,
On 27-02-12 09:00, wwp wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguinvnpenguin@vnoss.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoffice@plnet.rs wrote:
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.
Regards,
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
Hello Johan,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen jvermeulen@cawdekempen.be wrote:
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
- I then have a Selinux module
- Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often, and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.
You could restrict the testing repo to only libreoffice, see yum.conf(5) includepkgs=libreoffice or if there are dependencies needed from testing includepkgs=libreoffice dep1 dep2 ...
On 02/27/2012 11:16 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
Hello Johan,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulenjvermeulen@cawdekempen.be wrote:
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
- I then have a Selinux module
- Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often, and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.
You could restrict the testing repo to only libreoffice, see yum.conf(5) includepkgs=libreoffice or if there are dependencies needed from testing includepkgs=libreoffice dep1 dep2 ...
Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing list in this thread: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-September/008159.html , and packages will be moved to Extras repo.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing list in this thread: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-September/008159.html , and packages will be moved to Extras repo.
Hi,
Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly newer packages from here: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release rpm there, too). I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs at this stage as RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6 that will (hopefully) gracefully upgrade my packages.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:10:49PM +0000, nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly newer packages from here: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release rpm there, too). I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs at this stage as RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6 that will (hopefully) gracefully upgrade my packages.
Working well for me--if you're the maintainer, then, Thank you. :)
Johan Vermeulen writes:
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
- I then have a Selinux module
- Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
greetings, J.
Hi,
I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a: yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you will run into conflicts!
[1] - http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/nux-libreoffice-release...
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
nux@li.nux.ro writes:
Johan Vermeulen writes:
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
- I then have a Selinux module
- Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and then opening LibreOffice.
greetings, J.
Hi,
I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a: yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you will run into conflicts!
[1] - http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/nux-libreoffice-release...
Hopefuly Karanbir will quickly incorporate this in Centos-testing.. :)
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +0000 nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a: yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you will run into conflicts!
Thanks for your efforts Nux :-).
If at some point it would be possible for you to support 3.5 that would be great :-). I am currently using the 3.5.1 official RPM's in a home repo (so it's also shared to another CentOS box). But none-the-less it's good to see some progress regarding Libreoffice & CentOS :-).
Jake Shipton writes:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +0000 nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a: yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you will run into conflicts!
Thanks for your efforts Nux :-).
If at some point it would be possible for you to support 3.5 that would be great :-). I am currently using the 3.5.1 official RPM's in a home repo (so it's also shared to another CentOS box). But none-the-less it's good to see some progress regarding Libreoffice & CentOS :-).
Jake,
Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, nux@li.nux.ro a écrit:
... I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
One interest in using "official" RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice, is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines.
I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official" *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).
So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...)
Philippe Naudin writes:
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, nux@li.nux.ro a écrit:
... I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
One interest in using "official" RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice, is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines.
I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official" *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).
So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...)
-- Philippe Naudin
Thanks for taking the time to reply, Philippe. I'll try to put all your guys opinions together and see if I can come with anything that could work long term. Right now I'm trying to backport from Fedora, and while the heavylifting is done by Fedora people, it's still not easy to do this. I'll keep you guys updated.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official" *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).
So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...)
My srpms for meta-package are here: http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-srpms/RPMS.plnet-compiled/
but my rpms also have problems with removing openoffice.
Le ven. 20 avril 2012 19:24:37 CEST, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit:
On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official" *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).
So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...)
My srpms for meta-package are here: http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-srpms/RPMS.plnet-compiled/
but my rpms also have problems with removing openoffice.
Thanks Ljubomir,
The problem occurs only when removing openoffice (like in "yum remove"), or also when updating it ?
If it happens only when removing (and this is normal IMHO), it's already a big progress in comparison with my previous attempts.
Cheers,
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +0000 nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Jake,
Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
Hi,
The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.
The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would usually be tagged with a ".hr" tag (ie, <packagename>-<version>.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal.
But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would require a rebuild.
So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to "/var/www/html/repository/<arch>" (Which is actually just a link to /home/<username>/rpmbuild/RPMS)
Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:
createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/<arch> createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS
A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now from local machines on the LAN I would just use "yum install libobasis* libreoffice*" etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages. and "yum update" takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the above..)
This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could also be done publicly, however it is still a "messy" method even if somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).
I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for EL6.
I guess that raises the question of "You have the repo, rpmbuild etc setup, why don't you build them your self?", and to answer it:
Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core here....)
But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).
PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had been awake only a few minutes.
Jake Shipton writes:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +0000 nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Jake,
Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
Hi,
The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.
The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would usually be tagged with a ".hr" tag (ie, <packagename>-<version>.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal.
But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would require a rebuild.
So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to "/var/www/html/repository/<arch>" (Which is actually just a link to /home/<username>/rpmbuild/RPMS)
Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:
createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/<arch> createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS
A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now from local machines on the LAN I would just use "yum install libobasis* libreoffice*" etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages. and "yum update" takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the above..)
This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could also be done publicly, however it is still a "messy" method even if somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).
I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for EL6.
I guess that raises the question of "You have the repo, rpmbuild etc setup, why don't you build them your self?", and to answer it:
Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core here....)
But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).
PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had been awake only a few minutes.
Thanks Jake for the details. Well, what you say about building it yourself is what I'm actually trying to do now, but it is not a piece of cake: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/i386/ http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/x86_64/ But at least it's done Fedora/Redhat way :-)
I will seriously look into making a proper repo out of the Libreoffice.org rpms.. I'll let you know how it goes.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +0000 nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Jake,
Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
Hi,
The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.
The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would usually be tagged with a ".hr" tag (ie, <packagename>-<version>.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal.
But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would require a rebuild.
So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to "/var/www/html/repository/<arch>" (Which is actually just a link to /home/<username>/rpmbuild/RPMS)
Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:
createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/<arch> createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS
A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now from local machines on the LAN I would just use "yum install libobasis* libreoffice*" etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages. and "yum update" takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the above..)
This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could also be done publicly, however it is still a "messy" method even if somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).
I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for EL6.
I guess that raises the question of "You have the repo, rpmbuild etc setup, why don't you build them your self?", and to answer it:
Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core here....)
But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).
And that's what I did as well. Check this out: http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_for... I'll spam this in a separate message on the usual places.
Also, more good news comes from Redhat as RHEL 6.3 will contains Libreoffice 3.4.5!
-
Anthony Lee Vanover II -
Frank Cox -
Jake Shipton -
Johan Vermeulen -
Johnny Hughes -
Ljubomir Ljubojevic -
Markus Falb -
Nux! -
nux＠li.nux.ro
-
Philippe Naudin -
Scott Robbins -
Vnpenguin -
wwp