<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Those of us running Redsleeve 6, have had to deal with no up to date
EPEL6-arm. Fortunately, most that I needed were noarch, so I was
able to just get the rpms and do a localinstall.<br>
<br>
So we really do need an EPEL5-arm and someone maintaining it...<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/06/2015 10:16 AM, Troy Dawson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPeVoyMNh-X3v6oummzuK4K0_U00bBgL_yrz6_oTeRigO+2TOg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>I'm not sure if this question belongs here or on a
fedora mailing list. Or maybe it's already been discussed
somewhere and I just missed it.<br>
<br>
</div>
Is there a plan on what to do with EPEL7 packages, for arm?<br>
</div>
Is Fedora thinking of adding arm to the EPEL7 build arch?<br>
Is CentOS planning on hosting a repo that contains those?<br>
If so, will it be all EPEL7 or just a subset?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Right now, if you had all the CentOS7 arm packages compiled
and ready to go, you wouldn't be able to create a build/plague
machine, because mock, and several of it's dependencies, are
in EPEL7, and not RHEL7.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Anyway, if this has already been discussed, could someone
point me at it. If it hasn't, where would be the appropriate
place to discuss it?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Thanks<br>
</div>
<div>Troy<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Arm-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org">Arm-dev@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>