<html><head></head><body>I too am a sys admin, but on that note, I've been doing a lot of docker recently. Were the plans to throw that (and the "extras") in too to see if they compile? I can always try to compile docker on a raspi as well. Arch, fedora and I think raspbian/Debian have docker in their repos, so I suspect it may work without patching, but docker being anti 32-bit, it may need it.<br>
<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On October 9, 2015 2:31:32 AM CDT, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />Hash: SHA1<br /><br />On 08/10/15 11:39, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org><br /> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br /> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1<br /> <br /> On 05/10/15 14:15, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #8ae234; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi,<br /> <br /> I have recently been working through some of the failed CentOS<br /> 7 ARM RPM builds (<a href="http://armv7.dev.centos.org/report.html">http://armv7.dev.centos.org/report.html</a>) with<br /> the following successful builds:<br /> <br /> atlas (F21) <br /> <a
href="http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260230">http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260230</a><br /><br /> <br /></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>suitesparse (C7) gegl (C7) scipy (C7) gimp (C7) gsl (C7) bogofilter<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #8ae234; padding-left: 1ex;"> (C7) evolution (C7) evolution-ews (C7) evolution-mapi (C7) <br /> gutenprint (C7) brasero (C7 Modified BuildRequires<br /> brasero-devel) rhythmbox (C7)<br /> <br /> <br /> With atlas there appears to be a patch in the Fedora stream for<br /> the same version which fixes the armv7 build issue which<br /> appears to be blocking this package in the automated build<br />
process: * Sun Feb 16 2014 Marcin Juszkiewicz<br /> <mjuszkiewicz@redhat.com <mailto:mjuszkiewicz@redhat.com>> -<br /> 3.10.1-11 - Unbreak AArch64 build. - ARMv8 is different from<br /> ARMv7 so should not be treated as such. Otherwise atlas tries<br /> to do some crazy ARMv764 build and fail.<br /> <br /> After building atlas with the fixed package I was able to<br /> proceed building the other listed packages with their original<br /> C7 srpms.<br /> <br /> Can someone advise on the process for getting the patch from<br /> the Fedora package into C7?<br /> <br /> Thanks in advance.<br /> <br /> -Sam<br /> <br /></blockquote> <br /> Well, actually sending the patch (for the .spec and also the<br /> patch to be added -if any- as Source) to this list would be<br /> welcome. I know that we tried to have it working with the<br /> following patch already : <br /> <a
href="http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/patches/atlas-spec.patch">http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/patches/atlas-spec.patch</a><br /><br /> <br /></blockquote></blockquote>Not sure if that's the patch used by Fedora, would be good to compare.<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> Let's try to close that, and then release CentOS 7 for arm32,<br /> then building all pending updates too. :-)<br /> <br /></blockquote> <br /> Thanks Fabian,<br /> <br /> The patch looks to be one and the same.<br /> <br /> I downloaded the srpm with the patch applied from here <br /> (<a
href="http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1.src.rpm">http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1.src.rpm</a>)<br /><br /> <br /></blockquote>and it built cleanly on my armv7 hardware (ODROID XU4).<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br /> Is there a build log from the build servers for this patched<br /> version?<br /></blockquote><br />All the build logs are public (and even previous version).<br />For example , here is the build log for altlas :<br /><a href="http://armv7.dev.centos.org/rpmbuild/c7-pass-1-previous-buildlogs/6695-atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1/armv7hl/build.log">http://armv7.dev.centos.org/rpmbuild/c7-pass-1-previous-buildlogs/6695-atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1/armv7hl/build.log</a><br /><br />As I'm a sysadmin (read "not a devel guy") and so that infra has<br />priority #1
for me, I never had a chance to investigate why that one<br />was failing, nor even tried another time. (I just requeued it though,<br />let's see)<br />I don't know if underlying hardware used for the build could make a diff.<br /><br />The four armv7hl nodes we're actually using have :<br />cpu model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l)<br />Hardware : Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree)<br />Revision : 0000<br /><br />Those are actually running Fedora 21 with mock-1.1.41-3.fc21.noarch<br />The idea would be to switch that to c7 as soon as possible too, and<br />I'm pretty sure that we're close to that, if other people join the "party"<br /><br />- -- <br />Fabian Arrotin<br />The CentOS Project | <a href="http://www.centos.org">http://www.centos.org</a><br />gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab<br />-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)<br /><br />iEYEARECAAYFAlYXbVQACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6ypQCffF/+hNlYUPU9FdxAMZhVD2pq<br
/>9nsAniAAsRi4KkOsznrB0bY9hPSrquLO<br />=ITz6<br />-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br /><hr /><br />Arm-dev mailing list<br />Arm-dev@centos.org<br /><a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>