<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><div>Per my conversation with them, it is a 2U form factor, 48 nodes, with 8GB RAM and 64GB SSD (I imagine hard drives could be swapped for larger local storage if desired). </div><div><font color="#444444"><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 21.299999237060547px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><br></span></font><br><div>> To: arm-dev@centos.org<br>> From: arrfab@centos.org<br>> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:24:05 +0100<br>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] What's the best support hardware model ?<br>> <br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>> Hash: SHA1<br>> <br>> On 01/12/15 19:28, miniNodes Info wrote:<br>> > I do see that the conversation has moved on to ARMv8, but quickly<br>> > to add to the 32-bit discussion...The organization that purchased<br>> > the Calxeda assets reached out to me recently, and they have an<br>> > enterprise-grade 32-bit product ready to ship. I can share their<br>> > contact information if its desired (not sure of proper netiquette).<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > -David<br>> > <br>> <br>> Didn't even know that Calxeda had been acquired by another company (I<br>> thought they just went bankrupt)<br>> It would be interesting to consider if that can happen (some kind of<br>> armv7 1 or 2U server with some nodes and local storage)<br>> <br>> <br>> - -- <br>> Fabian Arrotin<br>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org<br>> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab<br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)<br>> <br>> iEYEARECAAYFAlZeAeUACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7hIQCcCcvCLmSi2/RgrMnnJynoMKyA<br>> d7YAn0/5Ldo6QIamLEYdZ08+kLduiduM<br>> =udXq<br>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Arm-dev mailing list<br>> Arm-dev@centos.org<br>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>