<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /></head><body><html><body><div><div data-html-editor-font-wrapper="true" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> <signature>Thanks :)<br><br><br>Nicolas Repentin<br><<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:nicolas@shivaserv.fr">nicolas@shivaserv.fr</a>></signature><br><br><br>9 octobre 2016 03:44 "Karanbir Singh" <<a target="_blank" tabindex="-1" href="mailto:%22Karanbir%20Singh%22%20<mail-lists@karan.org>">mail-lists@karan.org</a>> a écrit:<blockquote> <pre>On 08/10/16 12:15, Nicolas Repentin wrote: </pre> <blockquote>Hello<br><br>Can you tell me if CentOS 7 Armv7hl is maintained, and follow the same<br>versions of packages as x86_64 versions?<br><br>What is the end of life date for this version?</blockquote> <br>the arm7 repos are getting updates, in sync with the x86_64 tree, for<br>the rpms built/ported already<br><br><br> <blockquote>Maybe it's better to use aarch64?</blockquote> <br>the aarch64 distro is a more complete setup, yes - but you cant use<br>aarch64 distro on a armv7 hardware piece, so your choice in distro arch<br>will largely be driven by the hardware choices you make.<br><br><br>--<br>Karanbir Singh<br>+44-207-0999389 | <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.karan.org/">http://www.karan.org</a> | twitter.com/kbsingh<br>GnuPG Key : <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc">http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Arm-dev mailing list<br><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org">Arm-dev@centos.org</a><br><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev</a> </blockquote> </div></div></body></html></body></html>