[CentOS-devel] CentOS CS & GFS packages

Tru Huynh tru at centos.org
Tue Jul 19 06:45:52 UTC 2005


On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:10:16AM +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
> 
> >
> >I was thinking a GFS directory (one under 3 and one under 4) and the
> >$arch, SRPMS, $arch/GFS, $arch/CS under that ... so we can run
> >createrepo and yum-arch in $arch directory and have one repo (GFS) to
> >add to users yum configs instead of two.  How does that sound? (Since
> >for CentOS-4 they work together)
> I think they should be combined, but RedHat have decided that they are 
> separate.  It is worth adding extra confusion by not doing it 'The Red 
> Hat Way'?
> 
> If so, perhaps a "csgfs" directory, like the RH docs 
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/
> 

I second this idea, the RHGFS need the RHCS ones.

The main issue I see is the QA test: how do we compare
the CentOS binary rpms against the genuine ones?

I can re-sign your rpms, no pb.

cheers,

Tru

-- 
Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20050719/8dd28d40/attachment.bin


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list