[CentOS-devel] XFS module ... big troubles
Gernot Stocker
gernot.stocker at tugraz.at
Fri Apr 27 15:12:50 UTC 2007
On Friday 27 April 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> OK ... I can confirm that I copied a large file (650mb ISO file) from
> ext3 to XFS partition ... and the MD5 sums were indeed different
Bad for the module but good for my system ;-) I would suggest to remove
the i686 module from the devs-testing site until the problem is solved. We
have lost files, which we could restore somehow. But it shouldn't happen to
other people as well.
> (This is on an i686 kernel, with the standard module loaded)
My system is also a i686 system. In the other mail I meant with i386 the
i386-family.
> However, I did not have any errors in:
>
> "xfs_logprint /dev/hda3"
>
> so this is quite strange.
I think that the errors in xfs_logprint are just a matter of time and transferred files.
I'm synching a directory tree (using rsync) of about 2000 files with different size
and I'm checking it with a "find ./ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | sort" against the
original tree.
> I have the test suite compiled now and I will kick off this test in a
> little while.
Good hunting!
Gernot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070427/d624a3c0/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list