[CentOS-devel] Zero day updates upstream
Roger Peña
orkcu at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 16 17:51:04 UTC 2007
--- Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> C. Halstead wrote:
> > ----- "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists at karan.org>
> wrote:
> >> Just talking to Lance and Johnny online, and we
> feel the best way
> >> forward might be to add an Media-Updates/ repo on
> the iso's itself -
> >> then list both the local media updates as well as
> mirror.centos.org
> >> updates repo's in the anaconda screen, both
> disabled.
> >>
> >> We feel this gives us the max wins in each
> direction ( but will
> >> slightly increase the data size on the last cd,
> as packages from cd-1
> >> will move to cd-2 etc.
> >>
> >> I will still try and ensure that a minimum
> install is possible using
> >> only cd-1, but cant promise that.
> >>
> >> - KB
> >
> > +1 to this if we can still produce a single-CD
> minimal install. IMO the value if a one-disc
> install is higher than the value of a release that
> contains the initial update set. In a month or two
> there will be additional updates to apply anyway, so
> it doesn't seem prudent to sacrifice the one-disc
> install for the life of the release to gain a (very)
> small convenience up front. Just my .02
> >
> > ---
>
> if we can get a few more people voting this way,
> then I feel we have a
> decision on this issue.
I also vote for follow RH
the new kernel I think will not give any plus hardware
support only security fix, so why not to install it
inmidiatly after os instalation ...
cu
roger
__________________________________________
RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE )
Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list