[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

Maciej Żenczykowski zenczykowski at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 09:58:02 UTC 2007


I meant the extra centos tag added to the 5.0 built versio of the package.
I do understand the problem posed by the 5.1 version of the package being
out before 5.1 ;-)

On 11/1/07, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>
> Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos
> > built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1
> > against the 5.1 tree.
>
> That is what upstream is doing ... the problem is, they are releasing
> el5_1 stuff, built against the el5_1 tree _BUT_ as of now, there _IS_NO_
> el5_1 tree.
>
> That is what leaves CentOS without the ability to build these things as
> they are currently being built upstream.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071102/5a1928d8/attachment.htm


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list