zenczykowski at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 18:17:20 UTC 2007
Feels to me like even if the package has no changes it's 'different' than
upstream and should have the label + appropriate coment somewhere in the
On 11/2/07, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos
> > built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1
> > against the 5.1 tree.
> We thought about this at the time, however that would cause more
> confusion we felt. the '.centos' bit is added only when there is a
> change in the sources from upstream. I suppose we can revisit the policy
> should this kind of a thing become more common in the future.
> Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS-devel