heiko.adams at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 23:02:32 UTC 2007
I'd prefer the third option. This would allow us to have the update as
soon as possible and to be as close as possible to the original vendor.
Am Mittwoch, den 31.10.2007, 22:34 +0000 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1020.html release tags indicate
> it was built against 5.1, something we have not seen as yet....
> 1) We build it with what we have at the moment, 5.0 + Updates
> 2) We wait for 5.1 before building it ( Note: it _is_ a security
> issue... so keep this in mind )
> 3) We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild
> it when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different
> RPM and would involve most uses doing two updates.
> Opinions ?
Heiko Adams <heiko.adams at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071101/7c7a418c/attachment.bin
More information about the CentOS-devel