[CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 17:59:39 UTC 2008
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> Aggregation isn't a problem.
>
> It isn't aggregation IF it is a derivative work.
It can't be a derivative if an alternative could possibly work
(regardless of which you ship).
>>> (Well or at least it is a questionable proactice)
>>
>> Nobody questioned it when Sun was the only possible JVM.
>>
>
> Sure it was ... you don't see any of that stuff in Fedora do you?
I see it in RHEL. So shipping some GPL'd stuff too can't be a problem.
> Or
> Gentoo or Debian. If it was such a good idea, they all would have had
> it in there several years ago.
If those guys had all the good ideas there would be no need for ubuntu.
> If it doesn't work it doesn't ship ... and we are right back where we
> started.
>
> The bottom line is if you require that, buy a RHWAS and jboss
> subscription ... at least if we can't make a redistributable one work.
OK, I guess it's the thought that counts.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list