[CentOS-devel] a post-build test harness

Karanbir Singh mail-lists at karan.org
Wed Nov 26 17:45:03 UTC 2008


Hi,

One of the things that I'd like to get working sometime is a proper 
post-build test harness for rpm's. At the moment, what we do is quite 
basic, along with rpmdiff and some comparison tools we do a string of 
bash-written script tests. There must be another way of doing this, a 
sort of rpm::unit, for the lack of a better name, but modelled on Rspec. 
To illustrate :

For Pkg in PackageList: {
   ensure Pkg.SIGGPG => present;
};

Makes sure that Packages we are testing are signed, I guess it could 
also be ensure=> 'blahblah'; to make sure its signed with a specific key.

A more complex test might be to make sure that content in multilib pkgs 
match for overlapping content + multilib acceptable content.

An even more complex test might be to make sure any rpm that drops an 
init script also has a chkconfig stanza in the %post / %pre ( as an 
example ).

The first step would, of course, be to look at doing this per package, 
and then growing it to work with multiple packages ( eg. doing things like :

TestPackage: { ensure latest in -> 
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/updates/i386/ } ; to make sure that this 
new package does indeed provide an higher EVR than whatever is in the 
repo at the end of that url.

And having this harness pass or fail depending on the test outcome.

Perhaps this is not the right list, but most of the people who would end 
up using this or having to live with me forcing them to use it are on 
this list... so I thought this would be a good place to start.

Comments ? Am I wasting my time ?

- KB


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list