[CentOS-devel] old packages in centos-base repo after upgrade to 4.8

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Tue Aug 25 18:12:19 UTC 2009


Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> OK,
> seems like bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4 got into the 4.8 updates in the meantime,
> so the problem is certainly solved.
> have a nice day
> n.
>

Yes, all 3 of the RPMS you mentioned, as well as ntp and
evolution28-pango had updates released before 4.8 upstream, but did not
make onto the 4.8 ISO/Tree ... they have been moved into updates.

Thanks for the initial report.


> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Nikola Ciprich wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release.
>>> some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are 
>>> in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
>>>
>>> Could somebody check it please?
>>>
>>> with best regards
>>>
>>> nik
>>>
>> Pango is pango-1.6.0-9.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
>>
>> acpid is acpid-1.0.3-2.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
>>
>> bind is bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm is on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
>>
>> all of those are the same in our base repo and on our ISO.  We duplicate
>> their release in this, as that is our goal. (The things in the base repo
>> are what is on the ISO).
>>
>> I will double check all updates are pushed into updates if there are
>> some that were released by RH before 4.8 was released, but did not make
>> it onto their ISO.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090825/3c154a1d/attachment.bin 


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list