[CentOS-devel] CentOS/RHEL 5.3

Dag Wieers dag at centos.org
Wed Jan 21 16:11:00 UTC 2009


On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:19 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> Feel surprised to find in the RHEL 5.3 release notes the following
>> statement:
>>
>> ----
>> While anaconda's "upgrade" option will perform an upgrade from
>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.7 or 5.2 to Red Hat Enterprise Linux
>> 5.3, there is no guarantee that the upgrade will preserve all
>> of a system's settings, services, and custom configurations.
>> For this reason, Red Hat recommends that you perform a fresh
>> installation rather than an upgrade.
>> ----
>>
>> So they are advising to reinstall RHEL 5.3 even when you're running RHEL
>> 5.2.
>
> *speaking _for me / as me_, as always, etc.*
>
> I don't see the above text in the release notes, but what I do see is
> the top section of:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Installation_Related_Notes.html
>
> ...which implies (to me) that the text you quoted is saying something
> like "although a 4.7 => 5.3 upgrade has the same UI as 5.2 => 5.3, you
> shouldn't expect it to work as well in all cases".
>
> And, of course, that's all anaconda specific ... going 5.2 => 5.3 via.
> "yum update" is expected to just work.

I meant announcement, not release notes. See:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-January/msg00000.html

If "yum updated" is expected to work, the quoted paragraph is very bad 
worded. This is the kind of thing the Ubuntu people are using against RPM 
based distributions.

And how ill-informed it may be, it is better to avoid than to remedy.

-- 
--   dag wieers,  dag at centos.org,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list