[CentOS-devel] Upgrading postgresql (Re: CentOS/RHEL 5.3)
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Fri Jan 23 01:15:05 UTC 2009
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via packages.
>> Reality check:
>> You have a postgres upstream devel with years of experience
>> packaging postgres and me both saying
>> Don't attempt postgres database upgrades in packaging.
>> But create your own virtuality reality approach if you want.
> I think you missed my point, which is that RPM packaging doesn't provide
> facilities for what needs to be done. Postgres upstream is just more
> honest than most in recognizing the problem. It's not the only thing
> that ever has non-backward-compatible updates.
It's not hard to rebuild (some, at least) packages to use rpm's prefix
option. It allows to relocate the package at install time.
Doubtless Jeff will comment on the practicality of this, it's a feature
that's been around for years and years, but I've not seen it used much.
Best, though to have a complete test system where the entire application
- OS, database, webserver and anything else required is tested as an
It's getting easier with so many virtualisation choices, but even that
aside most organisations of any size should be able to find an old
Pentium IV or better to test on.
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
You cannot reply off-list:-)
More information about the CentOS-devel