[CentOS-devel] CentOS 5.4 Status

[IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR]

Mr. Singh,

    Well, if I were going to add details as to what I could do to help the
build effort, how would I do that intelligently when no one is willing to
give a status as to where the build effort is in terms of the project
milestones or what resources are currently under demand by the project?

    I am going to tell you straight away, having read Russ' comments, I am
in no way interested to work with him, and it appears he must be one of the
development team leaders. During my work day I get paid to deal with unhappy
people all day long, I am loath to volunteer to do it for free in my spare
time after hours. If you and the development team want to attract more
assistance from people, take note that pissing people off when they ask the
status of a project is not the manner by which to ascend along that path.

    In the mean time, I shall await Russ' apology in precedence to making a
decision as to what resources (monetary, computer related, or personal time)
I have available in pursuance of furthering the effort at hand. If in fact
Russ is not really one of the project leaders, and is just a "rouge member",
do let me know that too.

    One last note, I might be the sort of person to go and say these things
point blank, as I am a more direct person, but I imagine that there are
people perhaps on this list who read Russ' comments and are thinking to
themselves, "WOW...pffft...I am just going to stick to reading this list,
who would want to work with this guy?...."

    Have a most wonderful and blessed day.


V/R,

Stuart


Message: 7
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:43:14 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 5.4 Status
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4AD5AB42.7080608 at karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 10/14/2009 07:10 AM, IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR wrote:
>      Thank you for your reply, it was the sort of response I was curious to
> hear.

Just want to point out that I dont entirely disagree with Russ's post,
its usually a 'nice' thing to also add details on what you might be able
to offer to the build effort :)

- KB


------------------------------


-- 

Very Respectfully,

IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR
Las Vegas, NV / Beverly Hills, CA / Philadelphia, PA / Washington, DC
Amateur Radio Call Sign: N3GWG (Extra) / Marine Radio Operator Permit (MROP)
email: teners at bh90210.net (also carbon copies to my Blackberry)
phone: +(1) 310.358.0202 (Beverly Hills, CA, forwards to mobile phone)
phone: +(1) 215.338.6005 (Philadelphia, PA, voice mail only)
E-Fax: +(1) 928.437.4505 (Telecopier, fax to email gateway)

Military emails (checked monthly until remote NMCI access is secured)
NIPRNET: stuart.tener at navy.mil
NIPRNET: stuart.b.tener at us.army.mil
NRO:     teners at nro.mil
TS/SCI:  tenerstu at nro.ic.gov (GWAN)

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information, though strictly at the UNCLASSIFIED level.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the originate message.