[CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?

Charlie Brady charlieb-centos-devel at budge.apana.org.au
Mon Dec 13 22:03:08 EST 2010


On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Martin Jungowski wrote:

> It's not. It's just a general wondering as to why one would refer to 
> something as i386 when in reality it's i686 instead.

You should ask Red Hat. You're wasting your time (and ours) asking here.


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list