[CentOS-devel] Về: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3

Wed Feb 10 02:06:59 UTC 2010
NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk at yahoo.com>

Dear Fabian Arrotin

I cross-compiled the packages for ppc on x86
I just modified Makefile, configuration file or spec file if necessary to support to cross compile.
For example, the spec file of bash package on the attachment
I'm testing on PowerBook G4.


--- Ngày Thứ 4, 10/02/10, centos-devel-request at centos.org <centos-devel-request at centos.org> đã viết:

Từ: centos-devel-request at centos.org <centos-devel-request at centos.org>
Chủ đề: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3
Đến: centos-devel at centos.org
Ngày: Thứ Tư, 10 tháng 2, 2010, 0:00

Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
    centos-devel at centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    centos-devel-request at centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    centos-devel-owner at centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS?
      (Karanbir Singh)
   2. Re: Fasttrack for C-5 (Karanbir Singh)
   3. Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me" (Alan Bartlett)
   4. V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (NGUYEN VAN TAN)
   5. Re: V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (Fabian Arrotin)
   6. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS?
      (Marcus Moeller)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:11:27 +0000
From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Why are Spacewalk packages removed from
    CentOS?
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4B7053CF.7080109 at karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 04/02/10 21:43, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> As stated before, inclusion of the RHEL packages does not make much
> sence, as they are soon out of sync.

This conversation has gone past 2 full loops now. The only issue, as far
as I can tell, not cleared up is that can packages in the stock EL4 and
EL5 srpm tree be used against spacewalk 0.6 and 0.7 ?

They might be 'outdated' in that perhaps all features may not be
present, but is there an issue of these packages not being usable at all
due to an api incompatibility ?

-- 
Karanbir Singh
kbsingh at karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219      | Yahoo IM: z00dax      | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:41 +0000
From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Fasttrack for C-5
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4B705491.2090303 at karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 28/01/10 14:33, Ned Slider wrote:
>> Does the filesystem package no longer require CentOS branding changes to 
>> be rolled in?
>> $ rpm -q filesystem
>> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos.x86_64

Will look at that.
> Looks like pirut still needs it's Requires for rhn components removed too.
> error: Failed dependencies:
>          rhn-setup-gnome is needed by pirut-1.3.28-17.el5.noarch

And this as well.

thanks for acting as issue catcher, its good to know that stuff I farkup
is going to be caught along the line :)

btw, the major point of getting these packages into a repo was to work
on the code that allows us to produce a package-db api. After a lot of
feature creep and de-creep there is something that should mostly work.
I'll post more details on that in the next few days.

Also, by this weekend there should be yum-security working capability in
this ft-testing repo. I'll post an email here when thats in place.

-- 
Karanbir Singh
kbsingh at karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219      | Yahoo IM: z00dax      | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:00 +0000
From: Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org>
Subject: [CentOS-devel] Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for
    me"
To: CentOS developers mailing list <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID:
    <4e2e72e81002081018n2df9a6acjb7f7c7667733116f at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Just an appreciative comment [1] that I pass on.

Alan.

[1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24711&start=0#forumpost98463


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:15 -0800 (PST)
From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk at yahoo.com>
Subject: [CentOS-devel] V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
To: centos-devel at centos.org
Message-ID: <955141.78284.qm at web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all
I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5.
And now I'm trying to test the distro.

Thank you,

Nguy?n V?n T?n

--- Ng?y Th? 4, 3/02/10, centos-devel-request at centos.org <centos-devel-request at centos.org> ?? vi?t:

T?: centos-devel-request at centos.org <centos-devel-request at centos.org>
Ch? ??: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
??n: centos-devel at centos.org
Ng?y: Th? T?, 3 th?ng 2, 2010, 0:00

Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
??? centos-devel at centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
??? http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
??? centos-devel-request at centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
??? centos-devel-owner at centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

???1. CentOS test technique (NGUYEN VAN TAN)
???2. Re: CentOS test technique (Fabian Arrotin)
???3. Re: CentOS test technique (Timo Schoeler)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:11:27 -0800 (PST)
From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk at yahoo.com>
Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique
To: centos-devel at centos.org
Message-ID: <183807.78931.qm at web62403.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all

I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop.
Are there any techique to test the distribution?

Thank you. 

Nguy?n V?n T?n


? ? ? B?n lu?n mu?n k?t n?i v?i nhi?u b?n b? h?n tr?n blog v? trang web c? nh?n? T?o Pingbox m?i nh?t ngay h?m nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20100202/79ae8e62/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:53 +0100
From: Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4B67FC85.4090702 at arrfab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop.
> Are there any techique to test the distribution?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Nguy?n V?n T?n

What do you mean by " i've built a centos for my powerpc laptop" ?
The complete distro ? a ppc package ?
If that's the complete disto, are your patches available somewhere ? (as 
some packages including glibc.ppc and kernel doesn't build for ppc by 
default)
I'd be curious to know about all that ! :D
PS : we have a centos-ppc meeting this Friday, in a pre-Fosdem meeting, 
to discuss about the current ppc/ppc64, and the infrastructure around it.

--
Fabian Arrotin
test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > 
/proc/sysrq-trigger )





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:28:48 +0100
From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler at riscworks.net>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4B67FE60.3010406 at riscworks.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

thus Fabian Arrotin spake:
> NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop.
>> Are there any techique to test the distribution?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Nguy?n V?n T?n
> 
> What do you mean by " i've built a centos for my powerpc laptop" ?
> The complete distro ? a ppc package ?
> If that's the complete disto, are your patches available somewhere ? (as 
> some packages including glibc.ppc and kernel doesn't build for ppc by 
> default)
> I'd be curious to know about all that ! :D

Same here! :)

> PS : we have a centos-ppc meeting this Friday, in a pre-Fosdem meeting, 
> to discuss about the current ppc/ppc64, and the infrastructure around it.

Well, I was in IRC mid December and we (z00dax, amongst others) were 
discussing a PowerPC port of CentOS (especially as upstream will provide 
a PowerPC port of RHEL6). I do have some maschines here (I also could 
and would like to enable shell access to), the biggest one being a dual 
Power4+ (1.45GHz) 275. Also, I could provide ISP services like web 
space, maybe CVS/SVN stuff, mailing lists etc for free.

> --
> Fabian Arrotin
> test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > 
> /proc/sysrq-trigger )

Timo


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
*******************************************



      Yahoo! Mail nay NHANH H?N - Th? ngay! http://vn.mail.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20100208/37362f13/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:15:37 +0100
From: Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID: <4B70FD89.1060104 at arrfab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote:
> Hi all
> I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5.
> And now I'm trying to test the distro.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Nguy?n V?n T?n
> 

Well, are your modified CentOS sources available somewhere ? We'd be 
happy to look at it.
Have you produced a ppc or ppc64 build ?

-- 
--
Fabian Arrotin
test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > 
/proc/sysrq-trigger )





------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:07:09 +0100
From: Marcus Moeller <mail at marcus-moeller.de>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Why are Spacewalk packages removed from
    CentOS?
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
Message-ID:
    <fac47fca1002082307m3d24ee62uf0fa77955d141985 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Dear Karan.

...

> This conversation has gone past 2 full loops now. The only issue, as far
> as I can tell, not cleared up is that can packages in the stock EL4 and
> EL5 srpm tree be used against spacewalk 0.6 and 0.7 ?
>
> They might be 'outdated' in that perhaps all features may not be
> present, but is there an issue of these packages not being usable at all
> due to an api incompatibility ?

Not now, but maybe in upcoming releases of Spacewalk.

Spacewalk is meant to be used with the Spacewalk client tools, not the RHE ones.

Best Regards
Marcus


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3
*******************************************



      Chọn ngay địa chỉ email bạn thích!
Giờ đã có @ymail.com và @rocketmail.com. 
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/vn/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20100209/b5f1610e/attachment-0006.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bash.spec
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 35747 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20100209/b5f1610e/attachment-0006.obj>