[CentOS-devel] build errors with some RHEL6 packages
dmc.centos at filteredperception.org
Fri Nov 19 15:30:55 EST 2010
On 11/19/2010 05:16 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> thus Hugo van der Kooij spake:
>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:57:58 -0500 (EST), Charlie Brady
>> <charlieb-centos-devel at budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> couple of weeks after 6 is released.
>>> So, in about a week, eh?
>> Dream on. I just requested a 30 day eval. And all I can get is a Beta
>> of RHEL6. So it seems RHEL 6 is not realy realy there yet. It almost
>> sounds like another OS vendor ;-)
> I got mine without any problems. It's not beta.
I submitted my request last saturday, getting the automated confirmation
email telling me I'd get my 2 port activation soon. Nothing yet. I
think YMMV, perhaps depending on how they profile you. I would guess
there is a minimal human intervention in this process, and things are
triaged by your profiled importance as a customer.
I know it probably won't happen, but I would love to see early access to
round1 packages or the like. I know all the reasons it won't happen,
but it would be nice. beta2 I'm guessing would start causing me
problems around the time I decided I really wanted to use something from
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
More information about the CentOS-devel