[CentOS-devel] glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources

Sergio Rubio sergio at rubio.name
Wed Nov 24 04:23:00 EST 2010


Hi Leonard,

Had a few issues building x86_64 gcc from upstream rhel6 sources also. I was
building using a beta2 workstation install.
I was able to build them adding the official i386 beta2 repo, pulling deps
with yum-builddep and building with rpmbuild. I've shared them in case you
are interested:

http://mirror.frameos.org/frameos/6/core/x86_64/Packages/

Hope that helps.

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Leonard den Ottolander <
leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:57 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > So I built the x86_64
> > version with a plain rpmbuild. For the i686 I used mock.
>
> On the base system I did forget to install redhat-rpm-config. Even
> though this will not make the build fail it does result in a much bigger
> glibc-2.12-1.7.el6.x86_64.rpm as compared to the original
> glibc-2.12-1.4.el6.x86_64.rpm, even though almost all of the files
> inside are identical in size. I suppose the difference in file size is
> caused by the lack of brp-compress and the invocation of it after the
> build.
>
> Since the macros file is missing too
> %_binary_filedigest_algorithm 8
> is not set when building on the base system. This option sets the
> FILEDIGEST checksum to use SHA-256 instead of MD5. Could this be the
> cause for rpm not to consider the config and document files from the
> x86_64 and i686 glibc rpms to be identical?
>
> Regards,
> Leonard.
>
> --
> mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>



-- 
FrameOS Linux
website: http://www.frameos.org <http://www.frameos.org>
twitter:   @rubiojr
blog:      http://blog.frameos.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20101124/fe8f31b4/attachment.html 


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list