[CentOS-devel] glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources

Karanbir Singh mail-lists at karan.org
Fri Nov 26 10:54:13 EST 2010


On 11/26/2010 01:11 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is
>> incorrect.
> As you stated yourself, you are being pedantic. And I think you are
> deliberately making this thread more worse than it should be.

Being pedantic does not imply I am wrong. Your basis for the argument is 
flawed, and the lengths you are going to in order to circumvent that 
issue is odd.

> Explain to me how sending two mails to find users to test, is "repeated
> spamming" ? And while you know better, you can't resist the urge to
> disinform.

So you dont think its worth sticking with the same policy for you as it 
does for everyone else ? I'm not disinforming about anything but 
clearing out the crazy FUD you are trying to create here.

> I do think the problem is the content, as much as you don't like me
> mentioning we have alternative kmod-drbd packages (that actualy get
> updated frequently), you don't like others to discuss transparancy wrt.
> the build process or alternatives.

FUD... You clearly don't get it, why not stop trying and stop giving 
yourself all the grief ?

> Well, this is the Internet, get used to it.

I am also fairly sure that the 'internet' does not imply freedom to do 
as you want, when you want, where you want - and suite yourself in 
anyway you like with no response from anyone. Its the 'where' bit that 
you need to go think about a bit.


- KB


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list