[CentOS-devel] progress?

[R P Herrold]

On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> CentOS may have lost 1 of its vendor-sec representatioves, 
> but its a role that can be re-filled.

Not sure what is meant there, but the vendor-sec process has 
been relatively quiet of late.  Some updates ... thinking here 
of the recent OpenJDK set ... never passed on that list as to 
a co-ordinated release date. The real problem in CentOS' 
presence there is that as the project intentionally 'chases 
the tail-lights' to follow the upstream, warts and all, we 
rarely have anything to offer in the vendor-sec list

-- Russ herrold