[CentOS-devel] progress?

Larry Vaden vaden at texoma.net
Wed Feb 23 02:31:13 UTC 2011


On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote:
>
> But if you CAN detect "hidden" or "missing" (and I'm quite sure Johnny can),
> then adding a dependency is likely best for everyone involved, policy be damned.
>
> Why re-distribute SRPM's with "hidden" (or missing) dependencies? That
> kinda misses the point of dependencies in package metadata.

+1 (read: Amen!)



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list