[CentOS-devel] progress?

[Johnny Hughes]

On 02/24/2011 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/24/2011 10:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> And Les ... no, this is NOT easy to do.
>>
> 
> Which makes it seem like you'd want to attract additional resources that 
> might be able to help.  That's the part I'm missing, not the difficulty 
> or time/resource consuming nature of the problem.
> 
We have released everything that we do ... I am not understanding the
problem here.

We released the script we use to check the built RPMS,  we released
examples of the mock files, we released the ISO and Distro build script,
we released the version of software we use on the builders (centos-5,
up2date), we even released a list of all the hidden build requirements.
 There is NOTHING closed.  There is NOTHING that someone can't grab and
start working on the problem if they want to do so.

What we will not do is give access to our internal infrastructure (the
machines) or the ability to actually include anything built someplace else.

The issue here is, no one wants to do the hard work, they just assume
that I am holding back some secret sauce (which we are not).



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110224/fd109b97/attachment.sig>