[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?

carlopmart carlopmart at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 06:00:09 EDT 2011


On 03/23/2011 10:52 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:46:21AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
>>
>> I know that SL includes some custom components like OpenAFS in their
>> distribution, but base system is the same as CentOS. Then, I repeat, why
>> not?
>
> 	Because unless something has changed SL does not profess to be
> 	binary compatible with upstream

Are you sure?? What does it means "binary compatible" for you?? To me it 
means that the software "foo" works perfectly on both distros. And all 
the software I've tried, commercial and GNU, it works in both 
distributions with the same mistakes and equally effective and performance.


-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list