[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?

John R. Dennison jrd at gerdesas.com
Wed Mar 23 06:48:11 EDT 2011


On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
> 
> Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says 
> "compatible" too, like CentOS ...

	Honestly... This is a development list.  If you need to have the
	concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you
	are in the wrong place.





							John

-- 
No government is perfect.  One of the chief virtues of a democracy,
however, is that its defects are always visible and under democratic
processes can be pointed out and corrected.

-- Harry S Truman (1884 - 1972), 33rd US President, to a joint session
of the US Congress (12 March 1947), outlining what became known as
The Truman Doctrine
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110323/3a4c659e/attachment.bin 


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list