[CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release

Marko Bevc marko at bevc.net
Fri Sep 14 13:58:52 EDT 2012


My vote is for 1 , maybe even 2 :) It is truly usable and it is the first 
thing on new installs ;)

Regards,
Marko
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> hi guys,
>
> One bit of feedback at LinuxCon this year from people was that we should
> ship epel with a lower barrier to entry. And I have mixed feelings about
> that. But I wanted to know what everyone else thinks about :
>
> 1) Shipping epel-release in CentOS-Extras, so its installable, usable
> out of the box.
>
> 2) Shipping epel-release in the distro itself, with the epel repos's
> enabled=false. This is the option that most people seem to want, but I
> am least keen on.
>
> 3) do nothing, leave things as they are.
>
> Ofcourse, if we do either (1) or (2) we would need to set some sort of a
> baseline standard that allows other repo's to be included as well ( as +
> if they meet the baseline standard )
>
> regards,
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list