[CentOS-devel] initial testing version for DevTools 1.1

Dave Johansen davejohansen at gmail.com
Sun Jun 2 04:26:04 UTC 2013


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 02:13:46AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > > On 03/08/2013 04:35 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > > I was just on the IRC and because of the recent update to 6.4 through
> > > > the CR there was actually a newer version of scl-utils that ended up
> > > > being installed. After a little help on the IRC channel I was able to
> > > > uninstall the newer scl-utils and install the version from the
> > > > developer tools that Tru had built without any problems. So I'm not
> > > > sure what the issue was before, but it appears to be working now.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Excellent, however this means there is a problem with the devtools scl
> > > not working well with 6.4 ( which is now released and the current
> > > CentOS-6 ). If we can verify this, then its worth a note in the ReleaseNotes
> > >
> > I have just pushed scl-utils-20120927-2.el6.centos and
> > scl-utils-build-20120927-2.el6.centos that should fix the issue for CentOS-6.4
> > in my testing area.
>
> I just noticed that for the 32-bit builds the files are i386 instead
> of i686 like the rest of the files. Is that going to cause any
> problems?

I'm writing up a spec file that depends on devtoolset and then sets
CXX to /opt/centos/devtoolset-1.1/root/usr/bin/g++ so that it can use
the compiler installed by that package. I was just wonder a few
things:
1) Is that the "final" path? Or will it change to match the path in
RHEL once this development build of it moves to a permanent location?
2) If the answer to #1 is yes, is there a way to distinguish between
RHEL and CentOS in the spec file so it can use the appropriate path
for each of them?

Thanks,
Dave


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list