[CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4

Wed Jul 2 08:49:38 UTC 2014
Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>

On 07/02/2014 11:31 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org  [mailto:centos-devel-
>> >bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
>> >Sent: 02 July 2014 10:24
>> >To:centos-devel at centos.org
>> >Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4
>> >
> ....
>> >
>> >The tree's from the last few days have still implemented the 7.1406 scheme with
>> >almost no feedback, but for us to move forward we need a +1 vote from people
>> >here.
>> >
>> >the other scheme that is also on the options is the 7-0-1406 and
>> >7-0-core-1406
>> >
> Assuming STV, my preference would be
>
> 1. 7-0-core-1406
> 2. 7-0-1406
I have the same preferences as the original poster ("(option 1 makes it 
clear what RHEL release the build is derived from, with consistent 
naming for SIGs to follow and a date stamp to show the build age and 
cover rebuilds for cloud images) ") about these two. Even if I am still 
not convinced at all that we need to make this change.

> 3. 7.1406
definite -1 . We lose the pairing with the corresponding RHEL minor release