A few quick thoughts.... 1. Does the SIG need a naming convention also, e.g. CentOS-7.1407-Cloud-140805 i.e. the cloud SIG based build done on 5th August 2014 based off the CentOS 7 tree in July 2014. 2. The minor release number is not in the naming convention. Is this a question of length ? CentOS-7.0-1407 I am thinking as we get to beta releases of 7.1, having a mechanism to name the beta releases independently of the production ones would be useful. Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- > bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: 07 June 2014 02:44 > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > hi, > > Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking place > around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering how best to > accomodate these efforts. > > I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim. > > Thoughts ? Comments ? > > - - KB > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlOSYF4ACgkQMA29nj4Tz1usTwCgr9K0th6XcMzSmjGQvwnbeeiR > KhsAn36gaRbCuGoGzqEa2TN+TDFEEZjR > =GbVM > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----