On 2014-06-09 10:12, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > AS for the "definition" of change, It was made simple by devel guys. > There can not be no changes, beside most necessary, that distance CentOS > from RHEL. What RHEL publishes CentOS must also publish, with only as > minimal as possible changes. CentOS distro is not allowed to carry any > 3rd party repo files because RHEL does not have them, and CentOS project > strives to be binary compatible with RHEL. > > And then suddenly, after CentOS Project members get payed by Red Hat > CentOS project starts looking like Fedora respins, braking with RHEL > numeration, CentOS distro becomes experimental platform for software Red > Hat wants to push for better market share via respins, and we are left > explaining to every single newbie why that had to be done. I think this is the core issue - we (users) have the belive that centos is redhat without support - and I would like to keep it that way - no extra 3rd party repo files etc - pure RHEL - same version, same software. /niklas