[CentOS-devel] Centos 7 VS Gnome 3

Adam Miller maxamillion at fedoraproject.org
Thu Mar 13 06:21:59 UTC 2014


On Mar 12, 2014 10:45 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/07/2014 09:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Another issue is that Gnome3 needs 3D and does not work with x2go (and
> > probably freenx/nx  if that is going to be packaged).   And I almost
> > never work directly at a console.   KDE seems to mostly work, but it
> > is annoying to have to switch after all these years of RedHat pushing
> > GNOME.
>
> To clear something up, IIRC 7 uses GNOME Classic - not stock GNOME 3 -
> as its default, which does *not* require 3D.
>

I was under the impression that Gnome3 classic is just a set a of
gnome-shell extensions and a different CSS theme. Does it do something more
that makes Gnome3 not require 3D?

I thought Fallback mode (non-3d) was dropped when llvmpipe came onto the
scene.

-AdamM

> In the default desktop, GNOME looks a lot like GNOME 2x.
>
> This isn't to say we shouldn't package Mate or Xfce or any additional
> desktops for CentOS - but it'd be good to make sure people are moving
> away from the defaults as an informed choice.
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
> jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140313/3713e946/attachment.html 


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list