[CentOS-devel] RFC: Alternative Desktop SIG

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 17:26:56 UTC 2014


I would like to put together an alternative desktop sig which will build,
qa, and support desktops which are not the Enterprise Linux primary or
secondary desktops (GNOME and KDE).

There are a couple of ground rules I would like to propose:

1) Any desktop system needs to have 3 sponsors who are people willing to do
the work of building RPMS, coordinating user bugs with upstream, and fixing
packages. The reason for 3 is
  a) that this SIG isn't a dumping ground for here is ABC-DE compiled,
goodbye.
  b) that disagreements between sponsors should be deadlock free.
  c) that when people take vacations, etc there is continuity of operation.
2) Desktops do not keep to Enterprise lifetimes, but major version changes
to the desktop need to be announced, tested and released to a schedule.
Desktops which don't want to do that will not be part of the SIG. [A
schedule does not need to be super detailed, but just alleviate surprise.]
3) Desktops can and will be removed from the SIG if there isn't an interest
in keeping them up. This is mainly to cover that if ABC-DE desktop no
longer has sponsors, other members of the SIG aren't obliged to support
ABC-DE if they don't want to.
4) Some level of governance needs to be established so that there is a
committee that can make sure that a desktop has 'sponsors', that it is not
just code thrown over a wall and left, and that users are not left
surprised when updates to the desktop occur. They may also make up
packaging rules and guidelines as needed to alleviate problems that come up.

As this is an RFC, these are just proposed rules to be solidified when the
CentOS board considers the SIG.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140314/0677883f/attachment.html 


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list