[CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
jmelis at opennebula.org
Wed Mar 19 17:33:45 UTC 2014
How small have you made (1) ? do you have a kickstart file for it?
In my personal case I'd like to see (2) though, but I'll take what you have
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com>wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > the aim being to setup a base image, that is under 150mb to download and
> > deploy.
> I think there are (at least) two different types of "minimal" that could
> (and should) be provided.
> 1) "working server minimal" which would have at least yum and sshd --
> this could be similar to what we do for minimal now, though I'm not
> totally opposed to shrinking it down a bit more.
> 2) "really really minimal -- and we mean minimal!" -- where the goal is
> to strip out as much as possible, no docs, no yum, no ssshd, etc.
> I don't have a use for (2) personally, but use (1) -- or at least one of
> my own making -- quite frequently. I'd be happy if we could keep both.
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | jmelis at opennebula.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS-devel