[CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
riehecky at fnal.gov
Wed Mar 19 19:10:18 UTC 2014
On 03/19/2014 02:05 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
> On 19/03/14 16:57, Dan Porter wrote:
>> I like the name |server-minimal|, or even just |minimal| for the
>> purpose of what the current version is.
>> Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. |micro|?
> If it's an image without yum then I'd suggest we call it 'broken' and
> be done with it!
> There are quite enough people running systems without updates without
> encouraging them to do so.
How would a 'micro' installation suggest installing software so that the
image does something useful without yum?
Scientific Linux developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS-devel