[CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]

Fri Jun 5 22:10:59 UTC 2015
Chris S <getlegit at live.com>

Yes.


On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Karsten Wade < kwade at redhat.com 
[kwade at redhat.com] > wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2015 05:51 AM, 
Trevor
Hemsley wrote: On 05/06/15 13:45, kunaal jain wrote: bug.centos.org 
currently uses Mantis. We are not sure if Mantis meets our requirements. I 
will be reading about it more. It's extremely unlikely that the CentOS 
Project would convert from Mantis to Bugzilla just to accomodate this 
project. There have been discussions in the past about switching to use the 
upstream bugzilla instance and I do not recall the outcome of that 
conversation but since it hasn't happened and there doesn't seem to be a 
project in place to migrate, I suspect the answer was that it wouldn't be 
happening. Maybe this GSoC project's desire to use bugzilla might be 
another factor in that discussion or in a discussion about whether to dump 
Mantis in favour of bugzilla. Sorry for the
confusion, they aren't proposing changing the project's bug tracking tool,
that's orthogonal. This is just the usual thing of a project wanting a way 
to
track tasks (in this case, editing and approving content) and trying to 
work
with the current range of possible open source solutions. I raised the 
point on
the centos-docs discussion that it would be a bit of overhead on the 
sysadmins
to run another bug tracking tool, which is why we're now discussing other
options. Cheers, - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of 
Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid
(identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
Version:
GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlVyG7gACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFDxACeL30bJ/pbegoKJCICOHw1fM9y
0KsAnAtWoVDkWuaJhJhpYepkER5kK7Vo =uiRJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org 
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150605/5f710759/attachment-0008.html>