[CentOS-devel] CI for kubernetes, docker, etcd and other atomic packages

Sat Jun 13 00:13:54 UTC 2015
Ari LiVigni <alivigni at redhat.com>

I don't see why we need to move anything as long as we can produce the
results and artifacts and have it be outward facing.

I am currently getting all atomic fedora, centos, and RHEL on our
internal CI infrastructure.

The main thing missing for Centos that we have for Fedora and RHEL is a
notification mechanism.  We use fedmsg and CI message bus for those.  I
know Jan Chaloupke was advocating something similar for Centos.

I think it is a good idea since the mechanism for notification and
triggering are essentially the same.




On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 15:36 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 04:24 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> 
> > You would join the Atomic SIG and ask for credentials to build and run
> > CI jobs for all of the above. In fact, you are probably welcome to
> > move all your jobs to ci.centos.org as your single place to work from
> > rather than the internal-to-RH CI.
> 
> I don't think it's realistic to have CI/testing decoupled in infrastructure
> from the rel-eng/delivery - you really want tight integration to support
> things like "promotion" workflows where a build gets shipped in
> a broader channel after testing.
> 
> That argues for a model where Fedora has an independent Jenkins
> that's ideally similar in capabilities and model to what CentOS has.
> I think most of the work in Fedora currently is around Taskotron, which...
> it's not really worth going into the details too much, but I'm sure
> a Jenkins instance could be dedicated to this.
> 
> We could stand up something in projectatomic.io which gathers
> a summary of reporting but does not actually perform testing on
> its own, like what we're doing for links to images.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150612/2bd540f7/attachment-0008.sig>