<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Karanbir Singh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org">mail-lists@karan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Will Langford wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What flavor of geode are you looking for ? There's only a half dozen by the name :)<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I am effectively looking for people who might be able to help with this issue :<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2552" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2552</a><br>
<br>
At the moment it looks like there will be the need for an updates.img to change behavior install time.<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>At the moment, I've only got access to the original Cyrix/NatSemi/AMD Geode in the 200-266MHz class range. But... I do have a slightly off topic question.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If Sally can paint a house in 4 hours and John can paint a house in 6 hours...</div><div><br></div><div>No, seriously. Given the .... 'target' of CentOS as a RHEL alternative, is it necessarily appropriate to attempt to support such hardware ? While I can understand some energy density benefits of running an LX800, I just personally don't see it as fitting with the nature of CentOS.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Note: I'm pretty much just a quiet outsider and just a user for the most part... so my opinion carries no weight.</div><div><br></div><div>-Will</div><div><br></div></div></div>