<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Karanbir Singh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org">mail-lists@karan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Will Langford wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If Sally can paint a house in 4 hours and John can paint a house in 6 hours...<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Answer: 42 ?<div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Heh. Actually 2.4. </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
No, seriously. Given the .... 'target' of CentOS as a RHEL alternative, is it necessarily appropriate to attempt to support such hardware ? While I can understand some energy density benefits of running an LX800, I just personally don't see it as fitting with the nature of CentOS.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
That is indeed a very good question. Let me answer that in a few hours time when I am on a real computer, not over NX from my phone to the computer :D<div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I actually look forward to the answer. While I see linux or netbsd (etc) as a good swiss army knife base for alot of hardware, I don't think targeted distro's should attempt to swiss army knife it -- ya then get excessive complexity or limited features due to a low lowest-common-denominator :).</div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Note: I'm pretty much just a quiet outsider and just a user for the most part... so my opinion carries no weight.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No such thing, if you are using it - you automatically become a part of the community and voices are good.<br></blockquote></div><br><div>This is the 'developers' list :). As such, I'd imagine it'd be more for people working on advancing the distro heh. My only experience with CentOS is remote dedicated servers -- I don't believe I've actually ever manually installed it. I've worked with 4.x and 5.0... have yet to experience 5.1. So far I've been very very happy with CentOS in general. My 4.x box got violated a couple times, even rooted heh :(. The 5.0 installation seems to be doing much better. I've had some issues with getting up to date ant/java stuff for WowzaMediaServer/Red5, but all in all, I'd say I'm really happy with 5.0.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Here at work, we still use RH9.0 on production servers that go into the field (not broke, dont fix it). If we ever need to do a major update due to hardware limitations or similar... and a new distro makes sense, it'll be CentOS (gotta love being the top of decision making hehehe)... it's been rock solid on my remote machines (other than the poor 4.x box heh).</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Will</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>