<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
<br>
</div>Ok, the details are:<br>
<br>
checking for flex... flex<br>
checking whether flex is recent enough... no<br>
configure: error: Your flex version is too old. Please install flex version 2.5.33 or newer.<br>
<br>
So I guess you build a newer version of flex in order to build a newer<br>
version of wine, right ?<br>
<br>
I have been playing with the idea myself to have a separate 'build'<br>
repository in RPMforge that replaces a few of the 'older' buildtools. It<br>
would allow us to rebuild some software without pulling new requirements<br>
that replace base packages.<br>
<br>
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)<br>
<br>
It could be:<br>
<br>
.rf. rpmforge stable<br>
.rfb. rpmforge buildtools<br>
.rft. rpmforge testing<br>
<br>
What do people think ?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
-- dag wieers, <a href="mailto:dag@wieers.com">dag@wieers.com</a>, <a href="http://dag.wieers.com/" target="_blank">http://dag.wieers.com/</a> --<br>
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>It required a newer flex version to build. I took the fedora 7 version, which is new enough and it installs on centos 5.5 without complaining for dependencies. If you do some patching to the official version, it also requires a newer autoconf version. <br>
<br>Also for instalation it requires nss-mdns package, which i got from ATrpms.<br><br>