<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/27 Michał Piotrowski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mkkp4x4@gmail.com">mkkp4x4@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
W dniu 26 grudnia 2010 20:38 użytkownik R P Herrold<br>
<<a href="mailto:herrold@centos.org">herrold@centos.org</a>> napisał:<br>
<div class="im">> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Michał Piotrowski wrote:<br>
><br>
>> So I wonder what are the chances of seeing CentOS6 in 2011.<br>
>> Or perhaps a more realistic date is 2012? (Maybe you are<br>
>> waiting for the release of DNF?)<br>
><br>
> The choice always comes down to ship less well vetted content<br>
> fast; or a full set of which one may be proud, less quickly<br>
><br>
> My last post here noted that Red Hat ran a four month beta<br>
> program, AFTER their internal stabilization.<br>
<br>
</div>Yeah, but I don't expect from CentOS any stabilization - only rebuild<br>
of packages.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> My blog post<br>
> crossing '<a href="http://planet.centos.org" target="_blank">planet.centos.org</a>' made it clear<br>
<br>
</div>Sorry, but I did not even realize that such thing as planet.c.o exist.<br>
Also I did not realize that you and your blog exist.<br>
<br>
The only thing that I see is that after a month and half only one<br>
package has changed graphics/strings etc. Because I do not see any<br>
progress on <a href="http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/6/AuditStatus" target="_blank">http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/6/AuditStatus</a> I'm wondering<br>
if CentOS team wants to release this OS this year, next year or<br>
anytime in the near future.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> that the CentOS<br>
> team simply are not much driven to respond to 'popular demand'<br>
> or press pressure, and more motivated to produce a durable<br>
> product. Before that my post here noted that it was unlikely<br>
> that few oterh than hard core developers who enjoyed pain<br>
> would ever be able to do a yum transition from 5 to 6, as 6 is<br>
> rather radically different 'under the hood' as to SELinux<br>
> model<br>
><br>
> When people are inclined to carp about release pace, they<br>
> might find it more profitable to look through the open wiki<br>
> page on the release, or the open bugtrackker bugs, and<br>
> document a solution for an unresolved issue, if they wanted to<br>
> get a release sooner<br>
><br>
> ... just a wild idea<br>
><br>
> -- Russ herrold<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">--<br>
Best regards,<br>
Michal<br>
<br>
Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>i believe ,they will release version 6 within months. <br>
</div></div><br>