This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070808030804090700030202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/11/2011 6:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 08/10/2011 03:43 PM, Charlie Brady wrote: >> Relying on the upstream vendor's distribution of the unmodified SRPMS >> isn't sufficient to comply with the GPL. Probably wasn't deliberate, but >> if it was, it was a mis-judgement. > That isnt the strategy! > > srpms will start showing up in a few hours time, and should be complete > in the next 48 hrs ( onto mirror.c.o - local mirrors might take a bit > more time ). I'll also try and squeeze out the debuginfo's before we > start seeding 6.1 and 5.7 > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > I know your busy, but, any word on the debuginfo packages? Fred Wittekind --------------070808030804090700030202 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/11/2011 6:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: 
On 08/10/2011 03:43 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:

Relying on the upstream vendor's distribution of the unmodified SRPMS
isn't sufficient to comply with the GPL. Probably wasn't deliberate, but
if it was, it was a mis-judgement.

That isnt the strategy!

srpms will start showing up in a few hours time, and should be complete 
in the next 48 hrs ( onto mirror.c.o - local mirrors might take a bit 
more time ). I'll also try and squeeze out the debuginfo's before we 
start seeding 6.1 and 5.7

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
I know your busy, but, any word on the debuginfo packages?

Fred Wittekind
--------------070808030804090700030202--