<p><br>
On Sep 17, 2011 11:24 AM, "Karanbir Singh" <<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org">mail-lists@karan.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> imho, it would be wrong to force people to get the centos-release-cr by<br>
> default, specially in the centos-5 lifecycle since it would be a drastic<br>
> change in the way things work and what people's expectations might be.[1]<br>
><br>
Sorry, but I don't know any people who expected the default Centos update behavior to lag months behind upstream for security fixes.</p>
<p>> The important bit being that we keep the CR repo opt-in, and do our best<br>
> to create awareness of this repository, what it hopes to achieve and how<br>
> people can get it installed on their machines.</p>
<p>How does it make sense to recommend one thing and make the default something else? Especially when the default is not what people expect? <br>
-- <br>
Les Mikesell<br>
<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a><br>
</p>