<div dir="ltr">Hi Karanbir,<div><br></div><div>Stashboard sounds good . We could also post messages to a graphite instance based on what we metrics we need and it'll give you nice graphs ,especially when you want to compare it with other metrics (in case they are comparable). +1 for the idea.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Mamu</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Alberto Sentieri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:22t@tripolho.com" target="_blank">22t@tripolho.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Sirs:<br>
<br>
I have been seeing a lot of weird things happening lately, I mean, after<br>
the 500-more package update.<br>
<br>
After the last updates a Centos 6.3 32-bit virtual machine running under<br>
virtual box 4.2.8 does not boot anymore.<br>
<br>
I have just updated my workstation to "Linux version<br>
2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 (<a href="mailto:mockbuild@c6b8.bsys.dev.centos.org">mockbuild@c6b8.bsys.dev.centos.org</a>) (gcc<br>
version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Mar 13<br>
00:26:49 UTC 2013" and it unexpectedly locked when I started Thunderbird<br>
(there was a VM running under Virtualbox when I did it).<br>
CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE apparently completed the "locking job".<br>
<br>
Are you noticing that too?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Alberto Sentieri<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 03/13/2013 01:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>
> hi,<br>
><br>
> At the moment, we run tests on a nightly basis, only in kvm vm's and the<br>
> results dont go very far. I'd like to propose we use the entire QA<br>
> bladecenter and run the entire compliment of deploys and tests, then<br>
> post them in a status board which has some history ( stashboard ? )<br>
><br>
> Going one step further, we should run the entire t_functional tests as<br>
> well as start incorporating some of the, now stale, t_external tests.<br>
><br>
> At the moment we do deploys over http and nfs, to local and remote<br>
> storage, under Xen, KVM, bare-metal and some virtualbox and some vmware<br>
> hypervisors, for i386 and x86_64.<br>
><br>
> I had a brief chat with Fabian about this yesterday, and we both think<br>
> its doable, in the short term. Anyone else have thoughts about this ? or<br>
> want to propose reporting mechanisms that might be better in line with<br>
> the intended result : to give people a single perspective on the state<br>
> of things, as a confidence point. And also to allow people to easily add<br>
> tests that are then run nightly, so they can address their own corner cases.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
><br>
<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>