<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Sam Kottler <<a href="mailto:s@shk.io">s@shk.io</a>> wrote:<br>><br>><br>><br>> On 01/22/2014 05:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>> > On 01/22/2014 12:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>
> >> On 01/16/2014 04:11 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:<br>> >>> For OpenStack we need 0.7.x. It'll be great if we could have it in EPEL.<br>> >>><br>> >><br>> >> reporting from a conversation on irc earlier today, Sam is going to push<br>
> >> getting cloud-init 0.7.x into EPEL-6 within a few days time.<br>> >><br>> >> that then means we dont need to own cloud-init in CentOS-Extras/ for<br>> >> now, and images we ship will retain an upgrade path for the code/content<br>
> >> inside that.<br>> >><br>> >> I think its worth waiting for the newer cloud-init to arrive in epel.<br>> ><br>> > there is a possibility that we can get 0.7.5 of cloud-init, which will<br>
> > help resolve a bunch of issues with opennebula and cloudstack issues as<br>> > well.<br>><br>> 0.7.5 is not released upstream yet AFAICT despite their documentation<br>> site and other stuff being updated. Can anyone confirm this?<div>
<br></div><div>Confirmed. 0.7.5 isn't out yet. 0.7.4 isn't good enough?</div><div><br></div><div>...Juerg</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>> The version<br>> that's in ubuntu seems to be built straight from bzr. I've just<br>
> committed a pretty large changeset that bumps to 0.7.4; thanks to Lars<br>> Kellogg-Stedman and Steve Hardy for their assistance. There are still<br>> some dependency issues which I'm working on fixing now, but those should<br>
> hopefully be taken care of soon.<br>><br>> ><br>> ><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> CentOS-devel mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a></div></div>