<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Mar 12, 2014 10:45 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <<a href="mailto:jzb@redhat.com">jzb@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 03/07/2014 09:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:<br>
> > Another issue is that Gnome3 needs 3D and does not work with x2go (and<br>
> > probably freenx/nx if that is going to be packaged). And I almost<br>
> > never work directly at a console. KDE seems to mostly work, but it<br>
> > is annoying to have to switch after all these years of RedHat pushing<br>
> > GNOME.<br>
><br>
> To clear something up, IIRC 7 uses GNOME Classic - not stock GNOME 3 -<br>
> as its default, which does *not* require 3D.<br>
></p>
<p dir="ltr">I was under the impression that Gnome3 classic is just a set a of gnome-shell extensions and a different CSS theme. Does it do something more that makes Gnome3 not require 3D?</p>
<p dir="ltr">I thought Fallback mode (non-3d) was dropped when llvmpipe came onto the scene.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-AdamM<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">> In the default desktop, GNOME looks a lot like GNOME 2x.<br>
><br>
> This isn't to say we shouldn't package Mate or Xfce or any additional<br>
> desktops for CentOS - but it'd be good to make sure people are moving<br>
> away from the defaults as an informed choice.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> jzb<br>
> --<br>
> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst<br>
> <a href="mailto:jzb@redhat.com">jzb@redhat.com</a> | <a href="http://community.redhat.com/">http://community.redhat.com/</a><br>
> Twitter: @jzb | <a href="http://dissociatedpress.net/">http://dissociatedpress.net/</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</p>